Good day mam and sir,

Kindly, could you clarify your question in details so we could help you legally better with pleasure.

With the issuance of Ministerial Resolution 270, which was in the interest of the employer more than it is in the interest of the worker in terms of termination and wage reduction, according to the new Ministerial Resolution issued by Human Resources No. 270 for the year 2020, which was approved to maintain the interest of work which at the same time, according to the text of Article (2) of the decision, which gave the employer the right to the following:
1- Reducing wages
2- Granting the worker a paid vacation
3- Granting the worker leave without pay
So the medical condition that you are suffering from may intercede for you, and it is best to settle and explain the matter to the employer to take what is in your favor if approval has been obtained from him, as we advise you to refer to the decision and see it.
As for rights, you will have a reward according to the text of Article (132).
Article (132):
1. 21 days' wage for each of the first five years of service.
2. 30 days’ wage for each additional year of service provided always that the aggregate amount of severance pay should not exceed two year's wage.
Article (133):
A worker shall be entitled to severance pay for any fraction of a year he actually served, provided that he has completed one year of continuous service.

With the continuity of the validity of the previous contract and not its expiration, this is considered a legal violation with which a complaint can be submitted to the labor office, since it is not permissible to violate the job title in the contract for legal treatment in front of the labor office

You can submit the complaint to the Labor Office, as you have been clarified for the jurisdiction