Hi sir

We would like to inform you that as long as the company gave you a signed cheque from them, the legal responsibility is on her and it is considered a crime to issue a cheques without balance. In particular, referring to the Qatari Penal Code and to the text of Article (357) No. (11) of 2004, the prison sentences and / Without a balance or without a sufficient balance or order not to pay the check or deliberately edit or sign the check in a way that prevents the disbursement and therefore the correct procedure is to be covered these checks and then the civil lawsuit against the partner before the court and claim civil value checks, justified by the existence of the partnership between you with the provision of evidence That the loan has been withdrawn for the work of polytheism (27) for the year 2006 issuing the Commercial Law Article (595) of the check holder to refer to the drawer or the appearance and others who are committed to it if he submitted in the legal time, did not pay its value and proved failure to meet a protest.
Instead of invoking proof of failure to fulfill the following:
1- A statement issued by the drawee with the date of submission of the cheques.
2. A statement issued by a Clearing Department stating that the cheques was submitted on time and not paid.
The statement must be dated and written on the same check and stamped by the signature of the issuer. It is not permissible to refrain from placing this statement on the check if it is requested, even if the check includes a return condition with no expenses and a fine for which the drawee may request a deadline not exceeding the next working day to submit the check Submitted on the last day of the application.
In brief, if the contract of the company or the establishment that the partners are mutually exclusive sign the checks can then refer to the sponsor partner and claim the civil suit for the value of cheques in the case of payment and the fact that the signatures of the checks are the wife and has no legal attachment The company can be legally prosecuted and considered to have issued checks without a balance that requires legal penalty.