Razeena form Sri Lanka

Dear Customer,
Thanks for joining and trusting us, much appreciated! We welcome you to join us in the legal section
We would like to inform you that if you are a resident of Kuwait and has been lending an amount to a person whatever the objectives with preventing him from paying the amount and return can take many legal actions, you can go to the nearest police station and make a communication and explain the matter in detail for the purposes of the call later to this person and the obligation to refund the amount to you
Even if you have any evidence of indebtedness and a statement from the debtor, you can go to the Special Court of Enforcement and file a direct enforcement action against him to get your money. If you do not have any proof here, and by referring to the Kuwaiti Civil and Commercial Law Here we must pay attention to the above
Article 39
In non-commercial materials, if the disposition is worth more than five thousand dinars, or if the value is unspecified, the witnesses' testimony shall not be proven in its existence or expiry unless there is an agreement or a provision to the contrary. An obligation is estimated to be its value at the time of the disposition without the appendix to the asset. If the lawsuit involves multiple requests arising from multiple sources, the testimony of witnesses may be proved in each application not exceeding five thousand dinars, even if these requests collectively exceed that value, even if they originate between the parties themselves or acts of a single nature. The lesson of proving partial fulfillment shall be the value of the original obligation.
Article 40
It is not permissible to prove the testimony of witnesses and the value did not exceed five thousand dinars: First: Contradicting or exceeding what is contained in written evidence. Second: If the rest is required or part of a right, it may not be proven except in writing. Third: If one of the litigants in the lawsuit demands a value exceeding five thousand dinars, then his request is changed to no more than this value.
Article 41
It is permissible to prove the testimony of witnesses in the following cases: First: If there is a principle of proof in writing, the principle of proof of writing shall be deemed to be every writing issued by the adversary and that would make the existence of the alleged action very likely. Second: If there is a physical or literary impediment to obtaining written evidence. Third: If the creditor loses his written support due to a foreigner who has no hand in it
Article 42
The litigant who is required to testify with the testimony of witnesses shall indicate the facts that he wishes to prove in writing or verbally at the hearing. In the operative part of the judgment ordering the testimony of witnesses, each of the facts ordered to be substantiated and the day on which the investigation shall commence shall be indicated. If the court authorizes one of the litigants to prove the fact of witness testimony, the other litigant shall have the right to deny it in this way. The court may, on its own initiative, provide for the testimony of witnesses in cases where the law permits evidence in this way whenever it deems it useful for the truth. In all cases, it shall, whenever it is necessary to prove the testimony of witnesses, summon the testimony of those who deem it necessary to hear his testimony to demonstrate the truth.
If you have another question, feel free to ask us and we will answer with pleasure.
I hope my answer was helpful, please let me know if you have any follow up questions. If you feel I've answered your question already, please rate my answer from top of the page. Your feedback helps to ensure only the best experts are available to help you.
You can also ask questions of our other specialists in the areas of nutrition, therapists, IT specialists, doctors, and many more